ETHIC
Noun. Plural noun: Ethics.
A set of moral principles, especially ones relating to or affirming a specified group, field, or form of conduct.
I have always been brought up on strong ethical morals and values and I have inevitably taken these into my personal and professional life. However, I found reader 5 very compelling to read as it unveiled several new aspects of ethics that I have never considered before.
For example, I discovered that there are contrasting theories to ethics that sway the outcome of a situation.
Consequentialism means that where an act is morally right, and only if, that act maximizes the good. With regards to whether an action is morally right depends on the outcomes ( consequences).
JS Mill(1861) developed this theory of moral obligation to produce the greatest good for the greatest number (reader 5 page 9).
This theory can be deemed as imperative in large organisations as they strive to create the greatest outcome. However, it can be portrayed as unethical if your intentions are morally wrong.
A good example of this is the case study in reader 5 of the 'Ethics in Photography',(reader 5 page 11) the story of photographer Kevin Carter. It states that his lack of intervention on the girl's behalf was justified ( he and the other photographers were instructed not to touch anyone for fear of epidemics), but I believe ethical morals should over ride rules in this situation. He didn't help the little girl to find water, he followed 'the rules', and maximised his outcome by then winning a prize for the photograph. In a professional workplace such as teaching, the students are your number one priority. Consequences occur that may question rules and regulations but I believe that if the outcome is of a greater good then it should over ride the deontology ethical rule.
Deontology is where Immanuel Kant (1779) believed that moral rules are absolute and argued that only absolutely good thing is a good will. He stated that you should help people no matter what your desires are. For Kant, lying is always wrong no matter what the circumstances are.
Of course rules and regulations should be abided by in your professional workplace and community as it keeps the system working efficiently and smoothly. However in reference to the case study of the photographer in reader 5, the motives of his actions were morally wrong even though he was abiding by the rules. I believe in following deontology in the workplace to a certain extent, but if the rules question your ethical morals I would certainly go against them to ensure the outcome would always be morally right and that of a greater good.
Virtue ethics is a theory that focuses on the moral behaviour and character of a person rather than the importance of the action. But if the consequences and rules of the action are thrown out the window, how does that determine if it is morally right or wrong based on the person's character? In my opinion, if someone's actions are ethically unjust then that relates to that person's character. Your actions reflect on your personality, undoubtedly.
To pursue my professional inquiry there are many factors I must consider to ensure all information and research I convey is true and unbiased. Ultimately I want to establish that the people I am interviewing feel comfortable and safe with the questions I put forward to them. I intend to interview professionals in the field of Dance Movement Psychotherapy, so all interviewees will be over the age of 18 and will not need consent from a parent or guardian.
However, if I were to interview participant's of a dance movement therapy session who suffers with for instance, Parkinson's, would I need consent from a spouse or family member as well as themselves?
I will definitely use The British Educational Research Association (BERA) to conduct my ethics checklist when composing my inquiry plan.
https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Ethics-and-Educational-Research.pdf?noredirect=1
Ethical laws in professional practice need to be contemplated when piecing together my plan for my professional inquiry. Some of these are:
Data Protection Act http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/contents
Human Rights Act http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents
Equality Act http://equalities.gov.uk/equality_act_2010.aspx
I intend to scour these sources and determine that my findings in my research comply with these laws respectively.
References
Mill, JS (1987) Utilitarianism and Other Essays. London: Penguin.
Kant, I (2007) Critique of Pure Reason. London: Penguin Classics.
Tillman, L.M. (2010) Deadline: Ethics and the Ethnographic Divorce, Qualitative Inquiry, 10 (10) p1-3.
Noun. Plural noun: Ethics.
A set of moral principles, especially ones relating to or affirming a specified group, field, or form of conduct.
I have always been brought up on strong ethical morals and values and I have inevitably taken these into my personal and professional life. However, I found reader 5 very compelling to read as it unveiled several new aspects of ethics that I have never considered before.
For example, I discovered that there are contrasting theories to ethics that sway the outcome of a situation.
Consequentialism means that where an act is morally right, and only if, that act maximizes the good. With regards to whether an action is morally right depends on the outcomes ( consequences).
JS Mill(1861) developed this theory of moral obligation to produce the greatest good for the greatest number (reader 5 page 9).
This theory can be deemed as imperative in large organisations as they strive to create the greatest outcome. However, it can be portrayed as unethical if your intentions are morally wrong.
A good example of this is the case study in reader 5 of the 'Ethics in Photography',(reader 5 page 11) the story of photographer Kevin Carter. It states that his lack of intervention on the girl's behalf was justified ( he and the other photographers were instructed not to touch anyone for fear of epidemics), but I believe ethical morals should over ride rules in this situation. He didn't help the little girl to find water, he followed 'the rules', and maximised his outcome by then winning a prize for the photograph. In a professional workplace such as teaching, the students are your number one priority. Consequences occur that may question rules and regulations but I believe that if the outcome is of a greater good then it should over ride the deontology ethical rule.
Deontology is where Immanuel Kant (1779) believed that moral rules are absolute and argued that only absolutely good thing is a good will. He stated that you should help people no matter what your desires are. For Kant, lying is always wrong no matter what the circumstances are.
Of course rules and regulations should be abided by in your professional workplace and community as it keeps the system working efficiently and smoothly. However in reference to the case study of the photographer in reader 5, the motives of his actions were morally wrong even though he was abiding by the rules. I believe in following deontology in the workplace to a certain extent, but if the rules question your ethical morals I would certainly go against them to ensure the outcome would always be morally right and that of a greater good.
Virtue ethics is a theory that focuses on the moral behaviour and character of a person rather than the importance of the action. But if the consequences and rules of the action are thrown out the window, how does that determine if it is morally right or wrong based on the person's character? In my opinion, if someone's actions are ethically unjust then that relates to that person's character. Your actions reflect on your personality, undoubtedly.
To pursue my professional inquiry there are many factors I must consider to ensure all information and research I convey is true and unbiased. Ultimately I want to establish that the people I am interviewing feel comfortable and safe with the questions I put forward to them. I intend to interview professionals in the field of Dance Movement Psychotherapy, so all interviewees will be over the age of 18 and will not need consent from a parent or guardian.
However, if I were to interview participant's of a dance movement therapy session who suffers with for instance, Parkinson's, would I need consent from a spouse or family member as well as themselves?
I will definitely use The British Educational Research Association (BERA) to conduct my ethics checklist when composing my inquiry plan.
https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Ethics-and-Educational-Research.pdf?noredirect=1
"As a researcher - as a professor who teaches research ethics - I am obligated to ensure accuracy, to uphold confidentiality, to secure informed consent...and to promote beneficence." (Tillman 2010 p.1).It has occurred to me that I will likely interview an elderly person at some stage in the inquiry process and I have to acknowledge what impact this will have on them, and I will be compelled to ensure that the interview is beneficial to them, and not just for me.
Ethical laws in professional practice need to be contemplated when piecing together my plan for my professional inquiry. Some of these are:
Data Protection Act http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/contents
Human Rights Act http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents
Equality Act http://equalities.gov.uk/equality_act_2010.aspx
I intend to scour these sources and determine that my findings in my research comply with these laws respectively.
References
Mill, JS (1987) Utilitarianism and Other Essays. London: Penguin.
Kant, I (2007) Critique of Pure Reason. London: Penguin Classics.
Tillman, L.M. (2010) Deadline: Ethics and the Ethnographic Divorce, Qualitative Inquiry, 10 (10) p1-3.